rql #35549 grammar ambiguity for HAVING clause [resolved]

unresolvable with yapps, but we should fix grammar so that "(expr op expr AND expr op expr)" takes priority other "(expr)"

prioritynormal
typebug
done in0.26.3
load0.200
load left0.000
closed by<not specified>

Workflow history

from state (3)to statecommentdateUser
validation pendingresolved2010/10/13 22:18 UTCsthenault
donevalidation pending

version published

2010/06/21 11:23 UTCsthenault
opendone2010/06/21 09:42 UTCsthenault

Ticket #35549 - latest update on 2010/10/13, created on 2010/06/21 by Sylvain Thenault