hgview #259675 Why are there 23 open heads in logilab.org/hgview ? ... [done]
I'm confused about 23 open heads in the logilab.org/hgview repository:
If I count right, 6 heads by four people are starting from revision 1087:672df2c96dd8 [qt] open in editor -> open in external applicaiton Also, I'm confused about the https://bitbucket.org/logilab/hgview repository. It seems not up to date and I can not add tickets. What's the purpose? | |
priority | normal |
---|---|
type | task |
done in | <not specified> |
load left | 0.000 |
closed by | <not specified> |
Comments
-
2014/08/11 19:32, written by pydavid
-
2014/08/11 20:27, written by anclin
-
2014/08/11 21:45, written by pydavid
-
2014/08/12 09:38, written by anclin
add commentI do not see such amount on head in this repo. Apparently bitbucket is not automatically synced with the master repo at Logilab. Can you open a dedicated ticket for it (needs to be handled by someone at Logilab)
The Logilab repo had 23 heads and still has 6 "default" heads , at least for
$ hg --version
Mercurial Distributed SCM (version 2.8.2)
Bitbucket is another question...
works fine here. Are yoyu pulling the review repo?
::
% 14:43 pyd@marginatus /tmp > hg clone http://hg.logilab.org/master/hgview
destination directory: hgview
requesting all changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1080 changesets with 2180 changes to 255 files
hgviewupdating to branch default
110 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
% 14:43 pyd@marginatus /tmp > cd hgview
% 14:43 pyd@marginatus /tmp/hgview > hg head
changeset: 1079:f06d45260ddb
tag: tip
parent: 1078:a2119843d46c
parent: 394:09916aa04cf5
user: Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com>
date: Mon Aug 11 12:28:23 2014 -0700
summary: merge with old heads
changeset: 1077:f093e1820f5d
branch: stable
user: "Emile Anclin" <emile.anclin@laposte.net>
date: Wed Jul 30 14:07:09 2014 -0700
summary: [curses] fix broken urwid version check (closes #259133)
% 14:43 pyd@marginatus /tmp/hgview >
ok, I didn't know nor imagined that there could be a public review repository so I didn't pay attention to it...