yams #242339 [schema] provide a .relation(role) method [in-progress]

Will help avoid the nasty pattern:

for role in ('subject', 'object'):
    for rschema in getattr(eschema, '%s_relations' % role)():
        pass
prioritynormal
typeenhancement
done in<not specified>
closed by<not specified>
patch[schema] add a .relations(role) method [in-progress]

Workflow history

from state (1)to statecommentdateUser
openin-progress2014/04/29 09:52 UTC 

Comments

  • 2015/02/04 06:28, written by sthenault

    -1 on this. The example given in the commit message is already possible in the API, using

    for rschema, targets, role in eschema.relation_definitions():
   pass

    On this topic, I would rather introduce new APIs that return RelationDefinition instead of RelationSchema/targets as the legacy API does.

add comment

Ticket #242339 - latest update on 2015/02/04, created on 2014/04/29 by Aurelien Campeas