rql #10058776 HAVING clause is missing undo support [done]

For instance when an HAVING clause is inserted in the scope of facet query building, when select.recover is called, it crashes because there's no support for undo for HAVING.

prioritynormal
typebug
done in0.35.0
load0.500
load left0.000
closed by#a0bf7565501f Add "undo" support for HAVING clause
patchAdd "undo" support for HAVING clause [applied]

Workflow history

from state (2)to statecommentdateUser
in-progressdone2017/02/03 15:01 UTC 
openin-progress2017/02/02 16:11 UTC 

Ticket #10058776 - latest update on 2017/02/03, created on 2017/02/02 by Denis Laxalde