rql #10058776 HAVING clause is missing undo support [resolved]

For instance when an HAVING clause is inserted in the scope of facet query building, when select.recover is called, it crashes because there's no support for undo for HAVING.

prioritynormal
typebug
done in0.35.0
load0.500
load left0.000
closed by#a0bf7565501f Add "undo" support for HAVING clause
patchAdd "undo" support for HAVING clause [applied]

Workflow history

from state (4)to statecommentdateUser
validation pendingresolved

mass operation on Oct 29 2019

2019/10/29 17:37 UTCadmin
donevalidation pending

version 0.35.0 published

2019/02/13 10:17 UTCdlaxalde
in-progressdone2017/02/03 15:01 UTC 
openin-progress2017/02/02 16:11 UTC 

Comments

  • 2019/02/13 10:53, written by dlaxalde

    This patch breaks mutable queries with an HAVING clause, I'll work on a patch.

add comment

Ticket #10058776 - latest update on 2019/10/29, created on 2017/02/02 by Denis Laxalde